In Indian Scripts the consonants are sufficient in the numbers to symbolize all the articulation of mouth as individual or in combination. So much concise that it can be used to write any dialect of the world with no compromise or assumption. It circumscribes all the scripts available in the world. Whereas the other scripts when unknowingly adopted fails to recognize many of Indian words from literature and hence to portrait India. Use of A is a blunder mistake to represent. It surprises me based on my little knowledge if any expert on linguistic in India has raised it. If it is and is accepted then it gives oneself more freedom to use it without uniformity and all mistakes are forbidden. You will hardly find any word except in word ‘ A’lphabet which starts with in English dialect which we are introducing to the giant literature of India.
Another example is letter . Is there any word we find in English/ Latin to represent it? Wait. Is there even any word used at all in English Dialect? I doubt. This is the major area when we teach Indian Script to the children. They are not used to touch the tongue right behind the teeth. We got one full family of it. . If they being Indian do not entertain it on foreign land is basically our mistake. We unknowingly introduce Bharatiy letters in wrong way. It affects students from both sides of Ocean. There are two scenarios.
- Children abroad – The letters has specific phonics for them the language they learn. We try to map those on Indian script. Unknowingly we create confusion for them.
- Children in India – They try to map the 26 roman letters for their 53 phonetic letters they use in day to day life. pronouncing for T, for D.
Well begun is half done. So I could not introduce for A. With these compromise most of our Indian names are spelt wrong including mine. How one can expect it correct when those are not available in foreign dictionary? On other hand, How can we have a fair play of 26 against 53 to understand each other properly?